Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* [[Special_Sessions#ss2| SS2 Dynamic Data Driven Application Systems for Sensor Data Problems]] | * [[Special_Sessions#ss2| SS2 Dynamic Data Driven Application Systems for Sensor Data Problems]] | ||
* [[Special_Sessions#ss3| SS3 Context-based Information Fusion]] | * [[Special_Sessions#ss3| SS3 Context-based Information Fusion]] | ||
+ | * [[Special_Sessions#ss4| SS4 Homotopy Methods for Progressive Bayesian Estimation]] | ||
+ | * [[Special_Sessions#ss5| SS5 Data Fusion Methods for Indoor Localization of People and Objects]] | ||
+ | * [[Special_Sessions#ss6| SS6 Directional Estimation]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 72: | Line 75: | ||
<!-- FUSION 2016 Accepted Special Sessions --> | <!-- FUSION 2016 Accepted Special Sessions --> | ||
{| id="mp-upper" style="width: 80%; margin:4px 0 0 0; background:none; border-spacing: 0px;" | {| id="mp-upper" style="width: 80%; margin:4px 0 0 0; background:none; border-spacing: 0px;" | ||
− | <div id=" | + | <div id="ss3"></div> |
<!-- SS3 Context-based Information Fusion --> | <!-- SS3 Context-based Information Fusion --> | ||
| class="MainPageBG" style="width:100%; border:1px solid #a3babf; background:#f5fdff; vertical-align:top; color:#000;" | | | class="MainPageBG" style="width:100%; border:1px solid #a3babf; background:#f5fdff; vertical-align:top; color:#000;" | | ||
Line 88: | Line 91: | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | <!-- FUSION 2016 Accepted Special Sessions --> | ||
+ | {| id="mp-upper" style="width: 80%; margin:4px 0 0 0; background:none; border-spacing: 0px;" | ||
+ | <div id="ss4"></div> | ||
+ | <!-- SS4 Context-based Information Fusion --> | ||
+ | | class="MainPageBG" style="width:100%; border:1px solid #bdd6c6; background:#e7f7e7; vertical-align:top; color:#000;" | | ||
+ | {| id="mp-left" style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background:#e7f7e76;" | ||
+ | | style="padding:2px;" | <h2 id="mp-tfa-h2" style="margin:3px; background:#d6efd6; font-family:inherit; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #bdd6c6; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">SS4 Homotopy Methods for Progressive Bayesian Estimation</h2> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="color:#000;" | <div id="mp-tfa" style="padding:2px 5px"> | ||
+ | '''Description:''' This session is concerned with homotopy methods for the efficient solution of Bayesian state estimation problems occurring in information fusion and filtering. For state estimation in the presence of stochastic uncertainties, the best current estimate is represented by a probability density function. For that purpose, different representations are used including continuous densities such as Gaussian mixtures or discrete densities on continuous domain such as particle sets. Given prior knowledge in form of such a density, the goal is to include new information by means of Bayes' theorem. Typically, the resulting posterior density is of higher complexity and difficult to compute. In the case of particle sets, additional problems such as particle degeneracy occur. Hence, an appropriate approximate posterior has to be found. For recursive applications, this approximate posterior should be of the same form as the given prior density (approximate closedness). To cope with this challenging approximation problem, a well-established technique is to gradually include the new information instead of using it in one shot, which is achieved by a homotopy. For this session, manuscripts are invited that cover any aspect of homotopy methods for state estimation. This includes both theoretically oriented work and applications of known methods. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Organizers:''' Uwe D. Hanebeck, Fred Daum | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | | style="border:1px solid transparent;" |<br /> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- FUSION 2016 Accepted Special Sessions --> | ||
+ | {| id="mp-upper" style="width: 80%; margin:4px 0 0 0; background:none; border-spacing: 0px;" | ||
+ | <div id="ss5"></div> | ||
+ | <!-- SS5 Context-based Information Fusion --> | ||
+ | | class="MainPageBG" style="width:100%; border:1px solid #fff784; background:#fffff7; vertical-align:top; color:#000;" | | ||
+ | {| id="mp-left" style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background:#fffff7;" | ||
+ | | style="padding:2px;" | <h2 id="mp-tfa-h2" style="margin:3px; background:#fff7bd; font-family:inherit; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #fff784; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">SS5 Data Fusion Methods for Indoor Localization of People and Objects</h2> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="color:#000;" | <div id="mp-tfa" style="padding:2px 5px"> | ||
+ | '''Description:''' Indoor positioning has gained great importance as technology allows for affordable realtime sensing and processing systems. Researchers and developers can take advantage of the pervasiveness of WSNs (e.g., in the form of WLAN) and mobile sensors (such as smartphones) to obtain more accurate results by exploiting already existing infrastructure. Applications for indoor positioning include pedestrian navigation in public buildings and shops, location based services, safety for the elderly and impaired, museum guides, surveillance tasks, and also tracking products in manufacturing, warehousing, etc. Unlike outdoor environments, which are covered by GNSS to a satisfiable extent, indoor navigation faces additional challenges depending on the underlying measurement system such as occlusions, reflections and attenuation. While there are a great variety of sensors and measuring principles, in practice every single measuring technique suffers from deficits. While RF and (ultra-)sound are subject to multipath propagation, optical systems are intolerant to NLOS conditions. Some systems require setting up beacons, while others are self-calibrating and easy-to-install. Data fusion can overcome these limitations by combining complementary and redundant sensing techniques, with the application of algorithmic methods such as stochastic filtering. This Special Session addresses fundamental techniques, recent developments, and future research directions to help clear the way toward robust, accurate, indoor localization. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Organizers:''' Antonio Zea, Florian Faion, Uwe D. Hanebeck | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | | style="border:1px solid transparent;" |<br /> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- FUSION 2016 Accepted Special Sessions --> | ||
+ | {| id="mp-upper" style="width: 80%; margin:4px 0 0 0; background:none; border-spacing: 0px;" | ||
+ | <div id="ss6"></div> | ||
+ | <!-- SS6 Context-based Information Fusion --> | ||
+ | | class="MainPageBG" style="width:100%; border:1px solid #d6bdde; background:#f7eff7; vertical-align:top; color:#000;" | | ||
+ | {| id="mp-left" style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; background:#e7f7e76;" | ||
+ | | style="padding:2px;" | <h2 id="mp-tfa-h2" style="margin:4px; background:#e7deef; font-family:inherit; font-size:125%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #d6bdde; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">SS6 Directional Estimation</h2> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="color:#000;" | <div id="mp-tfa" style="padding:2px 5px"> | ||
+ | '''Description:''' Many estimation problems of practical relevance include the problem of estimating directional quantities, for example angular values or orientations. However, conventional filters like the Kalman filter assume Gaussian distributions defined on Rn. This assumption neglects the inherent periodicity present in directional quantities. Consequently, more sophisticated approaches are required to accurately describe the circular setting. This Special Session addresses fundamental techniques, recent developments and future research directions in the field of estimation involving directional and periodic data. It is our goal to bridge the gap between theoreticians and practitioners. Thus, we welcome both applied and theoretic contributions on this topic. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Organizers:''' Gerhard Kurz, Igor Gilitschenski, Uwe D. Hanebeck | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | | style="border:1px solid transparent;" |<br /> | ||
+ | |- | ||
__NOTOC____NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOTOC____NOEDITSECTION__ |
Revision as of 13:39, 12 February 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|